Review the SATURO data file and check that the water level is maintained (close to 5 cm), the low and high pressure are sustained and close to the set value, and the flux values for the last two pressure cycles are similar (comparing the same pressure head flux values). It is also a good idea to look at the averaged flux values, since the one-minute data are variable (which is why we provide the five-minute moving average data). The SATURO only uses the last pressure cycle to calculate Kfs and the standard error. The calculation also removes the first two minutes for each pressure head, since during the first two minutes the instrument is coming to the new pressure setting.
Refer to Figure 1 for an example of normal water level, pressure, and flux data.
Even though it looked like the instrument had a difficult time coming to the high pressure (Figure 1), this is not a problem and is actually a result of the algorithm for maintaining the pressure heads. The clear differences in flux at the high and low pressures are ideal; however, if the infiltration error is low, then it is acceptable if the flux at the high and low pressure heads doesn’t have this obvious of a difference (see Figure 2).
To increase the flux for the high-pressure setting, increase the high-pressure setting. In general for low-infiltration soils, a 10 cm difference between high and low pressure head is needed. If the flux is too low or too high after the first cycle, then stop the measurement and modify the settings. It is unnecessary to move the infiltration ring unless the issue with the measurement is the location (too many macropores or disturbed soil).
Consider modifying the settings to use a 20-25 minute hold time, and only run two cycles. This may provide better flux data.
If you find that data for the second cycle is better than the third cycle, then you can manually calculate saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs). Contact METER support for assistance.